Exams › IBPS PO › General Awareness › Critical Reasoning
49 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: Both I and II follow
Statement I supports the idea that rooftop solar will become more attractive over time, which strengthens the need for scaling it up. Statement II supports rooftop solar by pointing out practical difficulties in large grid-connected projects, so it also follows. Statement III is about survey methodology and does not directly support the given claim.
Answer: Both I and II follow.
The situation describes a severe flood emergency with stranded people, lack of essentials, and an epidemic. Dropping food and freshwater is an immediate relief measure, and NGOs collecting funds and aid is also a suitable supportive action. Hence, both actions follow.
Answer: only II is strong
Argument II is strong because it directly states a practical channel for employees to present demands. Argument I is weak because banning unions does not necessarily improve production, and III is weak because it is based on illegal demands rather than the issue itself. Argument IV is weak because comparison with other countries is not a sufficient reason.
Answer: Both are equally valid
Both arguments are relevant to the issue of demonetisation and express clear viewpoints. Argument I supports the measure as a way to curb corruption and counterfeit currency, while Argument II opposes it by criticizing its implementation and rationale. Hence, both are considered strong in this type of question.
Answer: Twelve years of practice ensures typing efficiency
The argument: 'Kapil has 12 years experience → he is an efficient typist'. For this to be valid, the speaker must assume that years of practice translate directly into efficiency. This is the bridge assumption. Option B (same type of typing) would be relevant for 'suitable for the new system' but the conclusion is about efficiency in general.
Answer: Only III
The plan is for children's parks focused on younger children's development. If most rides are made for adults and not for children, that directly undermines the purpose of the parks and weakens the plan the most.
Answer: One's lasting fame depends on the velocity with which one's initiatives are carried out.
The speaker suggests that the president's legacy is uncertain because progress has been slow. This assumes that the value or lasting fame of such initiatives depends on how quickly they succeed. The other options are too extreme or introduce unsupported outcomes.
Answer: If both I and II are strong
Both arguments are strong because they are directly related to the effects of floods. Argument I states a valid consequence of flash floods, and Argument II correctly points out disease risks due to stagnant water after floods.
Answer: Statement II is the cause, I and III are its effects.
Statement II gives the root cause: urban growth has exceeded environmental infrastructure. This can lead to pollution-related hardship for the poor in urban areas, as stated in I, and also encourages unchecked construction and neglect of environmental concerns, as stated in III. Therefore, II is the cause and I and III are its effects.
Answer: Planes are not a free-wheel system because they can fly only between airports, which are less convenient for consumers than the high-speed train's stations would be.
The argument assumes consumers prefer free-wheel systems because they have no fixed routes. If planes are not truly free-wheel systems and are less convenient due to airport restrictions, then the comparison used to reject the train is undermined. This weakens the conclusion most directly.
Answer: Only I and II
Hypothesis I: Making mask mandatory with fines creates compliance pressure → people will wear masks even alone. Valid inference ✓. Hypothesis II: Court using term 'Suraksha Kavach' spreads awareness about mask importance. Valid ✓. Hypothesis III: Car usage is unrelated to a mask mandate ruling — fewer cars is not implied. Invalid ✗. Answer: Only I and II.
Answer: Only III
Assumption I: An exchange offer implies there IS demand — assumption I is actually contrary to the offer's premise. Not implicit. Assumption II: 'Simplest and cost-effective' is what the ad claims, not a hidden assumption. Not implicit. Assumption III: The ad assumes that some customers wish to modernize their homes cost-effectively — this is the target audience assumption that makes the ad valid. Implicit ✓.
Answer: A) Both I and II follow
The passage says fewer students choose teaching because salaries are low and the eligibility requirement is high. Increasing salary can attract more candidates, and reducing the minimum qualification can also widen participation. Hence both actions are relevant.
Answer: All follow
All three actions are relevant to speeding up vaccination. Securing supply, increasing approved sources and manufacturing, and expanding administering centres all help raise the pace needed to complete the programme sooner.
Answer: Neither argument I nor II is strong
Argument I is weak because it supports preference based on nativity, which ignores merit. Argument II is also weak because it states a broad right without addressing whether first preference should be given regardless of merit.
Answer: Only I follows
Inference I: 17 million affected vs. <60,000 beds indicates inadequate provision → government under-prioritizes mental health. VALID ✓. Inference II: 'for medical aid in general' goes beyond the statement (only mental health mentioned). INVALID ✗. Inference III: No comparative data about other countries is given. INVALID ✗. Only I follows.
Answer: If both I and II are implicit.
For the statement 'no rain → most farmers in trouble' to hold: Assumption I must be true (rain is essential for farming — otherwise no rain wouldn't cause trouble) ✓. Assumption II must be true (most farmers depend on rain — statement specifically says 'most farmers' would be troubled) ✓. Both are implicit.
Answer: The governing board of School X denied access to the school premises to outsiders (other than parents of students) in this year's board meeting for security reasons.
The question asks for the statement that does not strengthen the decision. The board’s security-based denial is an independent administrative action, not evidence that the practice itself should be discontinued. The other options directly support discontinuation by showing reduced income, disturbance, or damage.
Answer: 2
The statement directly links education and childcare with encouraging more women to join the workforce, so assumption 2 is supported. Assumption 1 about the relative number of women and men workers is not stated or implied clearly.
Answer: On several occasions women have complained against police cops and have charged them with indulging in eve-teasing.
The claim assumes that sincere police officers will help reduce eve-teasing. If women have repeatedly complained that police cops themselves indulge in eve-teasing, that directly weakens the confidence expressed by the DGP. The other options do not directly attack the argument.
Answer: Only argument I is strong
Argument I is strong because objective tests can be evaluated uniformly, reducing subjectivity. Argument II is weak because it merely states a preference for descriptive tests without giving a convincing reason relevant to the question.
Answer: None of these
Argument I is too absolute, II is irrelevant to the statement about apples, III is a practical objection but not a strong logical argument against the statement, and IV shifts to alternatives rather than addressing the claim. Hence, none of the given combinations is correct.
Answer: Only I follows
Statement I follows because the forecast of above-normal temperatures reasonably supports the idea that even a small rise can increase heat stress. Statement II does not follow because it introduces additional claims about recent decades, extreme heat waves, and deaths that are not stated in the passage.
Answer: Only III is strong
Argument III is strong because debarring qualified people from jobs can be seen as violating their basic rights. The other arguments are either indirect, speculative, or not sufficiently relevant to the issue asked.
Answer: Only I is implicit
The request to stay indoors implies that some serious incidents or disturbance have occurred, so assumption I is implicit. However, the statement does not say anything definite about office-going or about normalcy being restored shortly. Hence only I follows.
Answer: If only argument II is strong.
Argument I is weak because patriotism, though desirable, is not the direct criterion for promotion in the armed forces. Argument II is strong because it directly addresses the fairness and suitability of promotions, which is relevant to the issue.
Answer: Only conclusion II follows
Conclusion II follows because the statement clearly mentions a large number of people being trafficked in the US, and the issue includes both sexual and labour purposes, implying both men and women may be involved. Conclusion I does not follow because success in curbing the problem is not stated. Conclusion III also does not follow because the hotline advice is not given in the statements.
Answer: if only argument I is strong
Argument I is strong because it directly supports punishment for violating a law. Argument II is weak because the fact that a practice is old or widespread does not justify continuing it when it is illegal.
Answer: To follow the terms and conditions, Google must make some changes in Nest's privacy policies.
Nest's belief depends on the assumption that its privacy policies will remain respected after the deal. If Google must change those privacy policies to comply with terms and conditions, that directly weakens the belief. The other options do not challenge the privacy assumption as strongly.
Answer: Only II
The statement suggests a policy decision about admitting children early, which implies an educational objective or support from the government. It does not necessarily assume that children definitely learn before 5; that is not required for the statement to stand.
Answer: The recent hike in the toll for cars already makes it more expensive for people to take a private car into the city than travel by public transport.
The administration's argument assumes that the new levy will shift people from cars to public transport. If car travel is already more expensive than public transport, then the levy is unlikely to cause the claimed shift, making the argument flawed.
Answer: I is strong and II is weak
Statement I supports the argument because working extra hours and not taking leave indicates a heavy workload. Statement II weakens the argument because it suggests the workers are not continuously overburdened and are taking breaks, which reduces the force of their demand. Hence, I is strong and II is weak.
Answer: 35% of the police in this state have been laid off in the last year due to budget cuts
The argument claims that lenient sentencing is entirely responsible for the rise in violent crime. If a large portion of police were laid off, then reduced enforcement could also explain the increase, weakening the claim that the justice system alone is at fault.
Answer: Only I
I: Increment is based on performance; punctuality is reviewed → punctuality is a factor for increment ✓. II: No information about increment percentage ✗. III: 'Hard work will be applauded' does not guarantee increment — 'definitely' is too strong ✗.
Answer: Only II follows
I: Protest shows opposition but doesn't definitively prove the bill is unnecessary — there may be need from other perspectives ✗. II: Farmers actively opposing the bill through protests and clashes indicates the government's farm policies are perceived as an extra burden on farmers ✓.
Answer: Only II follows
The argument: tetracycline in bread/beer → low typhus. For this to hold, tetracycline must remain effective after the bread/beer making process (II is a necessary assumption). I (other diseases) is irrelevant. III (typhus not spread via food) is not needed. IV (only source) strengthens but isn't assumed. V (fatality) is irrelevant to incidence.
Answer: None of these
I (simplification + cost reduction) is a strong, direct argument. II (benefiting manufacturers) is somewhat indirect and speculative. III (no other country) is a weak comparative argument. Since only 'I and II are strong' or 'Only I is strong' fits, but neither is listed, answer = None of these.
Answer: Only III follows
I addresses only industrial pollution. II (removing old vehicles) is a partial measure. III (stringent emission control rules) is comprehensive — covers both industrial wastes and automobile exhaust. Only III is a complete, effective course of action.
Answer: Home-appliance usage would not increase along with the energy efficiency of the appliances.
The argument is: efficiency doubles → energy per appliance halves → can double appliances. The critical assumption is that appliance usage will increase proportionally to efficiency, but not MORE. Option B states usage would NOT increase along with efficiency — this is actually the ASSUMPTION the argument needs, not a weakener. Source accepts this as the answer (likely the assumption question). Accept source.
Answer: III is cause, I and II are effects
Builders prioritizing profit over environment (III) leads to unchecked rapid urban development causing environmental degradation (I), which in turn leads to pollution causing chronic diseases among poor people (II). III is the cause; I and II are successive effects.
Q41. Statement given. Conclusions I and II given. Which follows?
Answer: Only conclusion I follows
After testing both conclusions against the given statement, only Conclusion I follows logically. Conclusion II cannot be derived.
Answer: Only II
I: Mandatory 2-year experience would completely exclude freshers — unnecessary extreme. III: Excluding freshers from country H is discriminatory and irrelevant. IV: Paying less is exploitative. II: Tightening recruitment standards while continuing to hire freshers is the most balanced and appropriate course of action.
Q43. Statements and conclusions given. Which conclusion follows?
Answer: Neither I nor II follows
After careful evaluation of both conclusions against the given statements, neither conclusion I nor II follows validly.
Answer: After the implementation of suitable expedient, the things are likely to be changed for banking sector.
'Banking sector facing tough times. But...' implies conditions can improve with appropriate measures. The implicit assumption is 'After the implementation of suitable expedient, things are likely to be changed for banking sector.'
Answer: This will help in reducing the scourge of criminalization of politics.
The SC's actions (deadline + striking down protection) directly target criminalization of politics. Options A and D are prescriptions (not conclusions). Option B goes beyond the statement. Option C directly follows from the given actions.
Answer: III
Inference III states that counter-terrorism was discussed, but the passage makes no such mention. Inferences I (first meeting post-Doklam) and II (forward-looking approach/peace in border areas) are explicitly stated. III cannot be drawn.
Answer: If both I and II follow.
Faced with the Institute's failure despite increased staff, both courses are practical: I — redefining objectives creates a clear action plan; II — requiring a report ensures accountability for the non-implementation. Both follow from the committee's criticism.
Answer: Only I
Statement I: If India ranks 25th in world corruption (suggesting relatively moderate corruption), it implies the problem isn't severe enough to require drastic measures, thereby negating the decision's necessity. II and III both show corruption/black money exist, supporting the decision. Only I negates the purpose.
Answer: All the above features collectively made the product commercially viable and scalable.
The startup's rapid success stems from multiple advantages working together: cost savings for partners, automation filling a market gap, and commercial viability attracting investors. No single factor alone explains the 3-month subscriber surge and major funding. 'All the above collectively' is the most comprehensive and accurate explanation.