Exams › JEE Main › Physics › Wave Optics
280 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: 1 minute
The angular resolving limit of the eye can be calculated using the formula that relates the wavelength of light to the size of the aperture. Given the pupil size and the wavelength of visible light, the calculation shows that the eye can resolve details down to approximately 1 minute of arc.
Answer: a sin θ = (2n − 1)λ/2
The condition for secondary maxima in a single-slit diffraction pattern occurs when the path difference between light from the edges of the slit is an odd multiple of half wavelengths, which is mathematically represented as a sin θ = (2n − 1)λ/2.
Answer: 12 cm
The true separation between the slits in a Fresnel biprism setup can be determined by averaging the two given slit separations, as they represent the effective distances created by the biprism. The average of 16 cm and 9 cm results in 12.5 cm, but since the options provided are discrete, the closest and most reasonable value is 12 cm.
Answer: 7th order of the first source and 5th order of the second
Fringes coincide when n1*2500 = n2*3500, giving n1/n2 = 3500/2500 = 7/5. So the 7th order of the 2500 A source overlaps the 5th order of the 3500 A source.
Answer: I0/2
Point opposite one slit is at y = d/2. Path difference = y*d/D = (d/2)(d)/(10d) = d/20 = (5*lambda)/20 = lambda/4. Phase = pi/2, so I = I0 cos^2(phase/2) = I0 cos^2(pi/4) = I0/2.
Q6. What is the relationship between the polarizing angle and the critical angle?
Answer: iₚ = tan⁻¹(cosec q_c)
Brewster's law: tan(ip) = n. Critical angle: sin(theta_c) = 1/n -> n = cosec(theta_c). Hence tan(ip) = cosec(theta_c), i.e. ip = tan^-1(cosec theta_c).
Answer: It becomes narrower and more intense
Central maximum angular half-width = lambda/a, so doubling slit width a halves the width (narrower). A wider slit admits more energy, so the central fringe also becomes more intense: narrower and more intense.
Answer: cos²(δ/2)
For two identical waves with phase difference delta, the resultant intensity is I = 4I0 cos^2(delta/2), i.e. proportional to cos^2(delta/2).
Answer: It becomes four times the original value
Fringe width beta = lambda*D/d. With d -> d/2 and D -> 2D, beta -> lambda(2D)/(d/2) = 4*lambda*D/d, i.e. four times the original.
Q10. In Huygens’ view, the substance that carries light waves is
Answer: luminous ether alone
Huygens assumed light waves are carried by an all-pervading hypothetical medium called the luminous (luminiferous) ether.
Answer: 450 nm
Both surface reflections undergo a pi shift, so maxima satisfy 2nt = m*lambda. Successive maxima: m*630 = (m+1)*420 gives m = 2, so 2nt = 2*630 = 1260 nm and t = 1260/(2*1.4) = 450 nm.
Answer: The fringes become closer together
Fringe spacing beta = lambda*D/d is proportional to wavelength. Blue light has a shorter wavelength than red, so the fringes move closer together.
Q13. Huygens’ idea of secondary wavelets is applied to explain which of the following?
Answer: It provides a geometrical construction for locating a wavefront
Huygens' secondary-wavelet principle provides a geometrical construction for locating the new position of a wavefront, from which laws of reflection and refraction follow.
Answer: π radian
At the first dark fringe in a single-slit diffraction pattern, the path difference between the wavelets from the edges of the slit and the midpoint is equal to half the wavelength, which corresponds to a phase difference of π radians, leading to destructive interference.
Answer: The fringe width decreases
Fringe width beta = lambda*D/d is proportional to wavelength. Blue light has a smaller wavelength than yellow, so the fringe width decreases.
Answer: x for blue light is less than x for green light
Fringe position x = n*lambda*D/d is proportional to wavelength. Green (5460 A) exceeds blue (4360 A), so x for blue light is less than x for green light.
Answer: (I0 / 8) sin² 2θ
After the first sheet intensity is I0/2. The middle sheet (axis at theta) gives (I0/2)cos^2(theta); the last sheet is at 90-theta to it, giving (I0/2)cos^2(theta)*sin^2(theta) = (I0/8)sin^2(2theta).
Answer: a = √(λL) and bmin = √(4λL)
Total spread b = a + lambda*L/a (geometric + diffraction). db/da = 1 - lambda*L/a^2 = 0 gives a = sqrt(lambda*L), and bmin = 2*sqrt(lambda*L) = sqrt(4*lambda*L).
Answer: cos⁻¹(1/√3)
The equation of the wavefront indicates that the wave is propagating equally in the x, y, and z directions, which corresponds to a direction vector of (1, 1, 1). The angle with the X-axis can be calculated using the cosine of the angle, which gives cos(θ) = 1/√3, leading to the correct answer.
Answer: 4: 1
Amplitudes are a1 = 3a, a2 = a. Imax/Imin = (a1+a2)^2/(a1-a2)^2 = (4a)^2/(2a)^2 = 16/4 = 4, i.e. 4:1.
Q21. Electromagnetic waves are transverse in nature is evident by
Answer: polarization
Polarization demonstrates that electromagnetic waves are transverse because it shows how the electric and magnetic fields oscillate perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation, a characteristic feature of transverse waves.
Q22. With reference to communication using optical fibres, which statement is incorrect?
Answer: Optical fibres are affected by electromagnetic interference from external sources
Optical fibres transmit data using light rather than electrical signals, making them immune to electromagnetic interference, which is a key advantage over traditional copper cables.
Q23. Which pair of sources is needed to observe interference of radiation?
Answer: that emit waves with the same frequency and maintain a fixed phase difference
Interference occurs when two waves interact, and for this to happen effectively, they must have the same frequency to ensure they oscillate in sync, and a fixed phase difference to maintain a consistent relationship between their peaks and troughs, leading to constructive or destructive interference.
Answer: tan⁻¹(n)
The angle of incidence for complete polarization at the boundary between air and glass is given by Brewster's law, which states that this angle is equal to the arctangent of the refractive index of the second medium (glass) relative to the first (air). Therefore, the correct expression is tan⁻¹(n), where n is the refractive index of the glass.
Answer: 4 I₀
When the slit width is doubled, the diffraction pattern becomes narrower, and the intensity of the central maximum increases. Specifically, the intensity is proportional to the square of the slit width, leading to an intensity of 4 I₀ when the width is doubled.
Answer: 1/2 I₀
When unpolarized light passes through a polarizing sheet, only half of the light intensity is transmitted, while the other half is absorbed or blocked by the sheet. Therefore, the intensity of the light that is blocked is 1/2 I₀.
Answer: 3/4
The intensity at a point in a double-slit experiment can be calculated using the formula I = I₀ cos²(φ/2), where φ is the phase difference. A path difference of λ/6 corresponds to a phase difference of π/3, leading to cos²(π/6) = (√3/2)² = 3/4, thus the ratio I/I₀ is 3/4.
Answer: 442.5 nm
The condition for the bright fringes in Young's double slit experiment is given by the formula mλ = d sin(θ), where m is the order of the fringe, λ is the wavelength, and d is the distance between the slits. Since the third bright fringe of the known light (590 nm) coincides with the fourth bright fringe of the unknown light, we can set up the equation 3(590 nm) = 4(λ_unknown). Solving this gives λ_unknown = 442.5 nm.
Answer: converge
Since mu = mu0 + mu2*I and I is largest on the axis (decreasing with radius), the refractive index is highest on the axis. The medium acts like a converging (GRIN) lens, bending rays toward the axis, so the beam converges.
Answer: Statement – 1 is true, Statement – 2 is true, Statement – 2 is the correct explanation of Statement – 1.
At the air-glass plate (bottom) interface the reflected wave gets a pi phase change while the top reflection does not, so at the centre (zero thickness) the net path difference is lambda/2 -> destructive -> dark centre. So Statement-1 is true, Statement-2 is true, and Statement-2 IS the correct explanation of Statement-1.
Answer: 2: 1
At P path difference 0 so I_P = Imax. At Q path difference lambda/4 gives phase pi/2, so I_Q = Imax cos^2(pi/4) = Imax/2. Ratio I_P:I_Q = 2:1.
Answer: 2
For coherent sources the amplitudes add: I1 = (A+A)^2 = 4A^2 (proportional). For incoherent sources the intensities add: I2 = A^2 + A^2 = 2A^2. So I1/I2 = 4A^2 / 2A^2 = 2.
Answer: Iₘ/9 (1 + 8 cos²(φ/2))
The correct option accounts for the amplitude difference between the two slits, leading to a resultant intensity that incorporates the phase difference and the squared amplitudes. The factor of 8 in the cosine term arises from the specific ratio of the amplitudes, reflecting how the interference pattern is modified due to the unequal slit widths.
Answer: I₀/4
When unpolarised light passes through the first polaroid (A), its intensity is reduced to half, resulting in I₀/2. As this light then passes through the second polaroid (B) at a 45° angle, the intensity is further reduced by a factor of cos²(45°), which is 1/2. Therefore, the final intensity is (I₀/2) * (1/2) = I₀/4.
Answer: 1/3
When the polaroid is rotated, the intensity of beam A decreases while the intensity of beam B increases. The condition for equal brightness after a 30° rotation indicates that the ratio of their initial intensities must be such that the contributions from both beams balance out, leading to the conclusion that I_A is one-third of I_B.
Answer: 30 μm
The minimum resolvable separation between two objects by the human eye can be calculated using the Rayleigh criterion, which takes into account the wavelength of light and the size of the pupil. Given the parameters, the calculation shows that the minimum separation is indeed 30 μm, making it the correct answer.
Answer: a = √(λL) and b_min = √(4λL)
The correct option relates the radius of the pinhole to the wavelength and length of the camera in a way that minimizes the diffraction spread, achieving the smallest possible spot size on the opposite wall. This relationship is derived from the principles of optics, where the geometrical and diffraction effects combine to determine the minimum spot size.
Answer: 7.8 mm
The least distance where the bright fringes coincide for both wavelengths is determined by finding a common multiple of their fringe positions, which occurs at a distance of 7.8 mm from the central maximum. This is calculated using the formula for fringe separation and the given wavelengths.
Answer: 45°
A and B alone give I/2, so they are parallel. With C at angle theta from A (and B), intensity = (I/2)cos^2(theta)cos^2(theta) = (I/2)cos^4(theta) = I/8, so cos^4(theta) = 1/4, cos^2(theta) = 1/2, theta = 45 degrees.
Answer: 25 μm
Central-max angular width 60 deg means half-angle 30 deg, so lambda = a*sin30 = 1 um * 0.5 = 0.5 um. Fringe width beta = lambda*D/d, so d = lambda*D/beta = (0.5e-6 m * 0.5 m)/(0.01 m) = 25e-6 m = 25 um.
Answer: 25: 9
Imax/Imin = ((a1+a2)/(a1-a2))^2 = 16, so (a1+a2)/(a1-a2) = 4, giving a1/a2 = 5/3. Intensity ratio I1:I2 = (5/3)^2 = 25:9.
Answer: 18.4°
With I = I0*cos^2(theta), output is 10% of input when cos^2(theta)=0.10 -> theta=71.6deg. To make output zero the analyser axis must be at 90deg, so it must be rotated a further 90-71.6 = 18.4deg.
Answer: 25°
Second minimum: a*sin60 = 2*lambda. First minimum: a*sin(theta1) = lambda, so sin(theta1) = sin60/2 = 0.433, giving theta1 = 25.7 deg, closest to 25 deg.
Answer: 30 μm
The minimum separation that the human eye can resolve is determined by the diffraction limit, which is influenced by the pupil size and the wavelength of light. Using the formula for angular resolution, the given parameters yield a resolution limit of approximately 30 μm, making it the correct answer.
Answer: 7.8 mm
The least distance where the bright fringes coincide for two wavelengths can be found using the formula for fringe positions, which depends on the wavelength and the slit separation. By calculating the least common multiple of the fringe positions for both wavelengths, we find that the first coinciding bright fringe occurs at 7.8 mm from the central maximum.
Answer: π/6
For single-slit minima, a sin(theta) = m*lambda. Slit width a = 22.0e-5 cm = 22.0e-7 m, lambda = 550 nm. For the 2nd minimum sin(theta) = 2*lambda/a = 2*(550e-9)/(22.0e-7) = 0.5, so theta = pi/6 rad.
Answer: 25 μm
The fringe width in Young's double-slit experiment is given by the formula β = (λ D)/(d), where β is the fringe width, λ is the wavelength, D is the distance to the screen, and d is the slit separation. Given the fringe width and the distance to the screen, the slit separation can be calculated, leading to the conclusion that the correct separation distance is 25 μm.
Answer: 305 × 10⁻⁹ radian
Limit of resolution = 1.22*lambda/D = 1.22 * 500e-9 / 2 = 305e-9 radian (D=200 cm=2 m).
Answer: 3.0 × 10⁻⁷ rad
Resolution limit = 1.22*lambda/D = 1.22*(600e-9)/2.5 = 2.93e-7 rad, which is close to 3.0 x 10^-7 rad.
Answer: 24 V/m
For normal incidence the transmitted electric-field amplitude is E_t = [2n1/(n1+n2)]*E_i = (2*1/(1+1.5))*30 = 0.8*30 = 24 V/m.