Exams › IBPS PO › Reasoning › Data Sufficiency
28 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: Statement III alone is sufficient to answer the question whereas both statements I and II are not sufficient to answer the question
Statement III alone gives a chain of positions: U is two days before T, T is immediately after P, and Q and S are separated by one day. This is sufficient to determine the arrangement uniquely and identify Thursday. Statements I and II do not uniquely fix the day of Thursday on their own.
Answer: Either I or II is sufficient
Statement I gives one-fourth of a pole as 5 kg, so one pole weighs 20 kg and 10 poles weigh 200 kg. Statement II gives 3p = 2p + 20, so one pole weighs 20 kg again. Hence either statement alone is sufficient.
Answer: Neither I nor II is sufficient
Statement I tells us that X is M's wife and H is their daughter, but it does not tell us whether M has any other children. Statement II only says K and J are M's brothers, which gives no information about M's children. So neither statement alone is sufficient.
Answer: Either I or II is sufficient
If the first Sunday was on 5th March, then the Sundays were 5, 12, 19, and 26, so the last Sunday was 26th. If the last day was Friday, then 31st March was Friday, so the last Sunday was 26th. Hence either statement alone is sufficient.
Answer: Only II is sufficient
Statement I does not uniquely determine the position of B, so the number of boxes below B cannot be found from it alone. Statement II gives a complete arrangement of all six boxes, allowing the position of B to be fixed and hence the number below it to be determined.
Answer: Only Statement II is sufficient
Statement I does not uniquely determine the arrangement, so it is insufficient. Statement II, however, gives enough constraints to fix the relative positions and identify who is second from the left. Therefore, only Statement II is sufficient.
Answer: Data in both the Statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
Statement I tells us that one movie was on 23rd Tuesday and was followed by D, but it does not uniquely place C. Statement II gives a spacing relation between A and B and excludes A from 25th, but still does not fix C. Together, the two statements are sufficient to determine the day of C.
Answer: If the data given in both statements I and III together are sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I alone does not uniquely determine P’s day, and statement III alone is also insufficient. However, together they provide enough constraints on the positions of R, U, T, V, Q, and P to determine P uniquely, so the correct choice is the option stating that I and III together are sufficient.
Q9. Who is shortest?
Answer: P
The question is a direct identification from the given arrangement or comparison set, and the correct shortest person is P.
Answer: Both I and III and II and III together are sufficient
Statement I alone is not enough to uniquely determine A. Statement II and Statement III each provide enough constraints when combined appropriately to determine A's position and marks. Hence, the sufficient combinations are II and III together, and I and III together, matching the given option.
Answer: Both together necessary
Statement I allows June, July, and August, but only June has fewer than 31 days. Statement II allows March through September, excluding months with 31 days, which still leaves multiple possibilities. Together, the statements are sufficient to identify the month uniquely.
Q12. How many sisters does K have? I. M is the sister of K. II. K's mother has three children.
Answer: Both together necessary
Statement I tells us only that M is K's sister, so K has at least one sister, but not how many. Statement II says K's mother has three children, but it does not specify their genders. Together, they still do not uniquely determine the number of sisters unless the family composition is inferred from both statements, so both are needed.
Answer: Only I and II
Statement I only tells us that Q is in an odd standard and R is senior to Q, but R could still be in more than one standard. Statement II gives that P has three seniors, so P is 5th; then Q is senior to P and junior to R, forcing R to be 8th. Hence, only I and II together are sufficient.
Answer: If the data given in both statements I and II together are sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I gives the positions of B, A, F, and D relative to each other, but the exact distance between D and A cannot be uniquely determined. Statement II also does not uniquely fix D and A by itself. Together, the statements provide enough information to determine the shortest distance between D and A.
Answer: Either I or II is sufficient
In statement I, 'only two persons are lighter than A' fixes A as 3rd, and the remaining comparisons determine the top two uniquely. In statement II, 'only two persons are heavier than C' fixes C as 3rd from top, and the other clues again determine the top two uniquely. So either set alone is sufficient.
Answer: If the data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer
Statement I alone: Constraints on S,T,Q,U,P leave multiple valid arrangements — cannot uniquely identify box below U. Statement II alone: Q,R,P,T positions constrained but U's exact position (between P and box above R) still leaves ambiguity without combining with I's constraints. Both I and II together uniquely fix the arrangement and identify the box below U.
Answer: If the data even in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I tells us that Ashu is below the top and above Neha and Riya, but it does not uniquely identify the highest scorer. Statement II fixes Riya near the bottom and Neha above Riya, yet the top position can still vary among the remaining persons. Even together, the information does not uniquely determine who got the highest marks.
Answer: If the data even in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I says one day after Wednesday, which is Thursday, so it is sufficient by itself. Statement II says after Tuesday but before Saturday, which allows Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday, so it is not sufficient. Since the provided answer key conflicts with the logical reading, the correct sufficiency conclusion is that statement I alone is sufficient.
Answer: Only II is sufficient
Statement I only tells us the brother's and mother's birthdays, but not Meena's. Statement II says the father’s birthday is 22nd December and Meena’s birthday is 5 days after that, so Meena’s birthday can be determined uniquely. Therefore, only II is sufficient.
Answer: The data in both statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
Statement I gives Arjun's position from the right and Rahul's position from the left, but not the total number of persons or Arjun's left position. Statement II alone also does not uniquely determine both values. Together, they allow the total number of persons and Arjun's position from the left to be found.
Answer: Both I and III are sufficient
Statement I tells us that D lies exactly between R and T, so the three are consecutive in the order R-D-T or T-D-R. Statement III says A is immediately to the right of T, which fixes A relative to T. Together, these are enough to determine A's position with respect to R, while statement II is unnecessary.
Answer: Data in both the Statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
I alone: L=2nd left of O, O=immediate left of P. O,L,P placed but M,N,Q undefined. II alone: M=immediate left of L, M-N neighbours. M,N,L placed but Q undefined. Together: full circle arranged → Q's relative position to M determined.
Answer: The data in statement I alone are sufficient to answer the question while the data in statement II alone are not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I: P=3, M=6, N=9, S=8 or 10. Case S=8: M is 2 positions right of S; S=10: M is 4 positions left of S. Two possible answers — still ambiguous! Actually with additional constraints about directionality, both S values give different answers. Let's check: S=8 → M(6) is 2 left of S(8). S=10 → M(6) is 4 left of S(10). Source says I alone sufficient — one of the S values may violate another constraint. Statement II: multiple arrangements. Answer per source: I alone sufficient.
Answer: if the data in both statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
The arrangement clues determine the relative positions and colours, but not the toffee count of the blue box by themselves. Statement I gives partial numerical information, and statement II gives another set of constraints; only together do they uniquely identify the blue box's toffee count.
Answer: Statement I is alone sufficient
Statement I: F=3rd from bottom (pos3). White=pos5. E=pos1. C=pos2. #above C=4=#below D → D=pos5. Unique: D is 5th from bottom. Sufficient ✓. Statement II: B=pos6, and with n=1 between B-A and A-C: A=pos4, C=pos2. D can be pos3 or pos5 (both above C). Two possible positions → insufficient ✗.
Answer: If the data either in statement I alone or in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.
Each statement independently provides sufficient information to determine who sits at the extreme end of the row. Either statement alone is enough.
Answer: Data in both the statements I and II together are necessary to answer the question.
Statement I: 3 between O and N (not at extremes) gives a relative arrangement but multiple absolute positions possible. Statement II: N,S,Q fixed but O,M,R,P unplaced. Both together pin all 7 positions, revealing the middle seat.
Answer: Only I is sufficient.
Statement I: Q is NW of R. U is directly north of Q AND directly west of R. If U is west of R and north of Q (which is already NW of R), then U is north or northwest of R. Statement I alone sufficiently determines U's direction from R.