Exams › IBPS PO › General Awareness › Data Sufficiency
23 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: The data in statement I alone or in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question.
From statement I, the total of the other four subjects is 4 × 84 = 336, so English = 430 - 336 = 94. From statement II, average of 5 subjects = 430/5 = 86, so English = 86 + 8 = 94. Either statement alone is sufficient.
Answer: The data given in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
The given markup percentages let us write selling prices as multiples of the cost prices, but they do not by themselves determine the absolute cost prices. Statement I gives only a ratio of selling prices, and Statement II gives only a relation between total profit and total discount; neither fixes the actual value of C. Even together, they still do not uniquely determine the scale of the cost-price ratio, so the cost price of C cannot be found exactly.
Answer: Statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I gives the simple interest amount, so the principal can be found uniquely using $SI = \frac{PRT}{100}$. Once the principal is known, compound interest for 2 years at 20% can be calculated directly. Statement II is not needed.
Answer: Only I and II are sufficient to answer
Statement I gives the selling price as ₹960 after a 20% discount, so the printed price can be found. Statement II says that without discount the shopkeeper would make 50% profit, which links printed price to cost price. Together they are sufficient; statement III is unnecessary.
Answer: If the data given in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I gives only the relation between cost price and marked price, not the selling price. Statement II gives a condition involving the increased cost price, but still does not uniquely fix the original selling price. Even together, the information is insufficient to determine one exact selling price.
Answer: None of the given statements can answer the question
Statement A: gives relative differences (B is ₹400 more than A, ₹200 more than C) — no absolute value. Statement B: gives ratio of investments — no absolute value. Statement C: gives ratio of profit shares — no absolute value. Even combining all three, we only get ratios and relative differences. Without one actual number, total profit is indeterminate.
Answer: II sufficient
To find November savings, we need November income and November expenditure, or at least enough information to derive November expenditure. Statement II gives all November expenses directly, so it is sufficient to determine November savings if income is known in the original set-up; in this question’s intended data-sufficiency framing, II alone is the needed statement. Statement I only gives combined expenditure for two months, so it is not sufficient.
Answer: Either statements I and II together or statements II and III together is sufficient to answer the question.
For two trains of equal length 175 m, the total distance while crossing is 350 m. Statement I gives the relative speed in opposite direction as 350/13, and Statement II gives the relative speed in the same direction as 350/65. Together, these can determine the individual speeds. Also, Statement II with Statement III is sufficient because the sum of speeds is given and the same-direction relative speed gives the difference.
Answer: The data either in statement I alone or in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I gives a direct relation between selling price, marked price, and discount, which is enough to find the selling price. Statement II also gives two profit percentages with a difference of Rs. 300, which is sufficient to determine the selling price uniquely.
Answer: Both the statements I and II together are needed to answer the question.
Statement I alone is insufficient because the discount percentage cannot be found without the selling price or cost price. Statement II alone is also insufficient because it gives the selling price and profit, but not the marked price. Together, they allow us to find the cost price and then the discount percentage.
Answer: Both statements I and II together are needed to answer the question.
Statement I gives only an equation involving the train’s speed and length, so it is insufficient alone. Statement II gives the speed relation and the length of Train B, but not enough to directly find Train A’s length alone. Together, they allow solving for the speed of Train A and then its length.
Answer: Statement I and II both together is sufficient
Statement I gives relationships among income and expenditure, but not exact values, so the savings ratio cannot be found alone. Statement II gives savings of S and V and a relation involving D’s income, but still does not fully determine D’s savings alone. Together, the two statements allow the required ratio of savings of V and D to be determined.
Answer: The data either in statement I alone or in statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I gives a direct relation between A and C, and with the given ratio information it is enough to determine the rates. Statement II also gives a direct relation between A and B, which again can be used with the given ratio to determine the needed values. Therefore, either statement alone is sufficient.
Answer: Either I and II or I and III
In partnership problems, profit shares are proportional to capital × time. Statement I fixes the capital ratio, while Statement II or III provides enough additional information to determine the time ratio and hence T. Therefore, either I and II or I and III is sufficient.
Answer: If the data in statement I alone is sufficient to answer the question, while the data in statement II alone is not sufficient to answer the question
Statement I gives the investment split as 5:x and also provides a direct interest difference after the same time period, which is enough to form one equation in x. Statement II does not uniquely determine x because the ratio is fixed at 5:3 while x appears only in the rate and time relation, making it insufficient on its own.
Answer: Both statements together are needed
I alone: SI rate×time = 10%×5 = 50%. Total returned = 1.5P. Cannot find P without total. II alone: Total received = 240/0.05 = ₹4800. Cannot find P without rate+time. Together: 1.5P = 4800 → P = ₹3200. Both needed.
Answer: Both not sufficient
Statement I gives the rate per square metre, but not the wall’s area. Statement II gives only the perimeter, which is not enough to determine area for a rectangle. Therefore, both statements together are still insufficient.
Answer: Both the statements taken together are necessary to answer the question, but neither statement alone is sufficient to answer the question.
Statement I only tells us that the lengths of trains A and B are equal, but not their actual length. Statement II allows us to find the length of train A using the pole and platform data, but it does not directly give B's length unless combined with Statement I. Therefore, both statements together are needed.
Answer: Either statement I or statement II by itself is sufficient to answer the question.
From statement I, SP:CP = 2:1 and SP = 50000, so CP = 25000 and profit = 25000. From statement II, profit is 25% of CP, so SP = 125% of CP; with SP = 50000, CP = 40000 and profit = 10000. Each statement alone is sufficient.
Answer: Either II or III
I alone: percentages given but no monetary value → insufficient. I+II: food=₹4000=25% → salary=₹16000, savings=40%=₹6400 ✓. I+III: med=₹2500=35% → salary=₹7143, savings≈₹2857 ✓. Since I+II alone or I+III alone is sufficient, the other statement is redundant. Answer: Either II or III.
Answer: Neither I nor II sufficient
The graph provides expenditure percentages, but A's November income cannot be uniquely determined from either statement alone. Statement I relates only the change in savings, and statement II relates B's savings to A's October savings, so neither is sufficient by itself.
Answer: Both the statements I and II together are needed to answer the question.
Statement I alone is insufficient. Statement II alone is insufficient. Only when both statements are combined can the question be answered definitively.
Answer: The data either in statement I alone or in statement II alone is sufficient to answer the question
I: Mark-up 40%→MP=1.4CP. MP:SP=7:6→SP=6/7×1.4CP=1.2CP. SP-CP=0.2CP=20→CP=₹100 ✓. II: CP:SP=5:6→SP=1.2CP. Profit=SP-CP=0.2CP=20→CP=₹100 ✓. Both independently sufficient.