Exams › IBPS PO › Reasoning

In each question below, some statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Some sweets are not cars. All cars are houses. No house is cool. Conclusions: I. All sweets being cool is a possibility. II. Some sweets are houses.

1. If only conclusion I follows
2. If only conclusion II follows
3. If either conclusion I or II follows
4. If neither conclusion I nor II follows

Correct answer: If only conclusion I follows

Solution

Since some sweets are not cars, they may lie outside the set of houses and therefore can be cool without contradiction, so conclusion I is possible. But there is no definite statement that some sweets are houses, so conclusion II does not follow.

Related IBPS PO Reasoning questions

• Statements: In a one-day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these, 160 runs were made by spinners. Conclusions: I. 80% of the team consists of spinners. II. The opening batsmen were spinners.
• Statements: The old order changed, yielding place to new. Conclusions: I. Change is the law of nature. II. Discard old ideas because they are old.
• Statements: Population increase coupled with depleting resources is going to be the scenario of many developing countries in the days to come. Conclusions: I. The population of developing countries will not continue to increase in future. II. It will be very difficult for the governments of developing countries to provide their people a decent quality of life.
• Statements: Primary school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result, there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers. Conclusions: I. A method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised. II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV on the readership of newspapers.
• Statements: N ≥ U > W; F < H ≤ S; G = N; W ≥ S. Conclusions: I. H < W II. U > F III. S < G Which conclusion(s) is/are true?
• Directions: In the following question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusions among the given conclusions is/are definitely true and then give your answer accordingly. Statements: A ≥ B ≥ C; C < D < E; E ≥ F ≥ G; G < H > I Conclusions: I. A > I II. D < F III. F > I

⚔️ Practice IBPS PO Reasoning free + battle 1v1 →