Exams › IBPS PO › Reasoning

Statements: Primary school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result, there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers. Conclusions: I. A method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised. II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV on the readership of newspapers.

1. Only conclusion I follows
2. Only conclusion II follows
3. Either I or II follows
4. Neither I nor II follows

Correct answer: Neither I nor II follows

Solution

The statement only describes the rise in TV viewing and the decline in newspaper readership. It does not suggest any specific method to increase readership or any need to send experts abroad. Therefore, neither conclusion follows.

Related IBPS PO Reasoning questions

• Statements: In a one-day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these, 160 runs were made by spinners. Conclusions: I. 80% of the team consists of spinners. II. The opening batsmen were spinners.
• Statements: The old order changed, yielding place to new. Conclusions: I. Change is the law of nature. II. Discard old ideas because they are old.
• Statements: Population increase coupled with depleting resources is going to be the scenario of many developing countries in the days to come. Conclusions: I. The population of developing countries will not continue to increase in future. II. It will be very difficult for the governments of developing countries to provide their people a decent quality of life.
• Statements: N ≥ U > W; F < H ≤ S; G = N; W ≥ S. Conclusions: I. H < W II. U > F III. S < G Which conclusion(s) is/are true?
• Directions: In the following question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusions among the given conclusions is/are definitely true and then give your answer accordingly. Statements: A ≥ B ≥ C; C < D < E; E ≥ F ≥ G; G < H > I Conclusions: I. A > I II. D < F III. F > I
• Nine persons L, N, O, P, Q, W, Y, V, and Z live in three different cities: Barcelona, Dehradun, and Texas, but not necessarily in the same order. Q lives with V but neither in Texas nor Dehradun. P lives only with Z but not in Texas. W does not live with V. N neither lives with Y nor in Dehradun. O either lives in Dehradun or Texas. N does not live in Texas. An odd number of persons live in Barcelona. O lives with L. How many persons live in Texas?

⚔️ Practice IBPS PO Reasoning free + battle 1v1 →