Exams › IBPS PO › Reasoning

Six persons P, Q, R, S, T, and U play six games: Riptide, Mini Militia, PUBG, Pokémon Go, Shadowgun, and Mario. They have different Google points: 21, 24, 36, 45, 77, and 98. Who plays PUBG and how many points? I. R plays Mini Militia. |P - Shadowgun player| = 21. S has the lowest points. II. T does not play Shadowgun. The average of R and T's points is given. The Riptide player is not the maximum. Q's points are less than the Riptide player's points. The Pokémon Go player has more points only than the Mario player. III. The Pokémon Go player has 24 points. S does not play PUBG. Neither U nor Q plays Pokémon Go or Riptide. PUBG player ≠ 36 points. P > Q. The Riptide player is not the lowest or highest. Which statements are sufficient?

1. All the statements are required
2. Only I and II are sufficient
3. Only I and II or I and III together
4. Only II and III are sufficient

Correct answer: Only I and II or I and III together

Solution

Statement I gives partial constraints, but not enough to identify PUBG. Statement II or III combined with I can complete the arrangement, and both combinations lead to the same conclusion. Hence, either I and II together or I and III together are sufficient.

Related IBPS PO Reasoning questions

• Statements: In a one-day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these, 160 runs were made by spinners. Conclusions: I. 80% of the team consists of spinners. II. The opening batsmen were spinners.
• Statements: The old order changed, yielding place to new. Conclusions: I. Change is the law of nature. II. Discard old ideas because they are old.
• Statements: Population increase coupled with depleting resources is going to be the scenario of many developing countries in the days to come. Conclusions: I. The population of developing countries will not continue to increase in future. II. It will be very difficult for the governments of developing countries to provide their people a decent quality of life.
• Statements: Primary school-going children in urban India have now become avid as well as more regular viewers of television, even in households without a TV. As a result, there has been an alarming decline in the extent of readership of newspapers. Conclusions: I. A method of increasing the readership of newspapers should be devised. II. A team of experts should be sent to other countries to study the impact of TV on the readership of newspapers.
• Statements: N ≥ U > W; F < H ≤ S; G = N; W ≥ S. Conclusions: I. H < W II. U > F III. S < G Which conclusion(s) is/are true?
• Directions: In the following question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusions among the given conclusions is/are definitely true and then give your answer accordingly. Statements: A ≥ B ≥ C; C < D < E; E ≥ F ≥ G; G < H > I Conclusions: I. A > I II. D < F III. F > I

⚔️ Practice IBPS PO Reasoning free + battle 1v1 →