Statements: F = T \le R > H Conclusions: I. F = R II. F > T

Only I is true
Only II is true
Either I or II is true
Neither I nor II is true

Correct answer: Neither I nor II is true

Solution

From F = T and T \le R, we only know that F \le R, not necessarily F = R. Also, since F = T, F > T is impossible. Therefore, neither conclusion follows.

Related IBPS PO Reasoning questions

Statement: P & R % T Q @ M Conclusions: I. Some R being not Q is a possibility. II. All M can be T. III. Some T being not P is a possibility. IV. All P can never be R.
Directions (43–45): In these questions, symbols ©, #, %, and @ are used with different meanings as follows: \(M © N\) means \(M\) is smaller than \(N\); \(M # N\) means \(M\) is either smaller than or equal to \(N\); \(M % N\) means \(M\) is greater than \(N\); \(M \ge N\) means \(M\) is either greater than or equal to \(N\); \(M @ N\) means \(M\) is neither smaller than nor greater than \(N\). Assuming the given statements to be true, find out which of the conclusions I, II and III given below are definitely true. Statements: \(B \; D \; % \; G @ Q;\; L # M © N # Q;\; M P % U\) Conclusions: I. \(D % U\) II. \(N % G\) III. \(M @ B\)
Tanya is older than Eric. Cliff is older than Tanya. Eric is older than Cliff. If the first two statements are true, the third statement is
Blueberries cost more than strawberries. Blueberries cost less than raspberries. Raspberries cost more than strawberries and blueberries. If the first two statements are true, the third statement is
All the trees in the park are flowering trees. Some of the trees in the park are dogwoods. All dogwoods in the park are flowering trees. If the first two statements are true, the third statement is
Mara runs faster than Gail. Lily runs faster than Mara. Gail runs faster than Lily. If the first two statements are true, the third statement is

⚔️ Practice IBPS PO Reasoning free + battle 1v1 →