StreakPeaked· Practice

ExamsGATEGeneral Aptitude

Consider the following statements relating to the level of poker play of four players P, Q, R and S. I. P always beats Q II. R always beats S III. S loses to P only sometimes IV. R always loses to Q Which of the following can be logically inferred from the above statements? (i) P is likely to beat all the three other players (ii) S is the absolute worst player in the set

  1. (i) only
  2. (ii) only
  3. (i) and (ii)
  4. neither (i) nor (ii)

Correct answer: neither (i) nor (ii)

Solution

The statements do not provide enough information to definitively conclude that P beats all players or that S is the worst. While P beats Q and R beats S, S's performance against P is inconsistent, and R's losses to Q do not establish a clear ranking among all players.

Related GATE General Aptitude questions

⚔️ Practice GATE General Aptitude free + battle 1v1 →