Exams › SSC CGL (Prelims) › General › Syllogism
16 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: Only II follows
From 'All pens are books', it follows that some books are pens. So conclusion II follows. But 'Some books are papers' does not ensure that those books are pens, so conclusion I does not follow.
Q2. Statements: A ≥ B = C < D, E > C ≤ F. Conclusions: I. D > B II. A ≥ C
Answer: Both I and II are true.
From A ≥ B = C < D, we get B = C and C < D, so D > B is true. Also, since A ≥ B and B = C, it follows that A ≥ C, so both conclusions are true.
Answer: Neither I nor II follow
From the statements, books are a subset of useful things, and some useful things are expensive. But there is no direct link between books and expensive things, so conclusion I does not follow. Also, we cannot say all expensive things are useful from 'some useful things are expensive', so conclusion II also does not follow.
Answer: Only I follows
From the statement that all airports have security checks, it is reasonable to conclude that passengers are screened at airports. However, the statement does not imply that crimes cannot happen at airports.
Answer: Both follow
Since all doctors are educated and all educated people are respected, all doctors must be respected. Also, if all doctors are respected, then some respected people can be doctors. Hence, both conclusions follow.
Answer: Only II follows
Conclusion II follows because some educated people are writers, so some writers are educated. Conclusion I does not follow because there is no definite link between teachers and unemployment.
Answer: Only I follows
Conclusion I is possible because pens are a subset of pencils, and some pencils are erasers; there is no contradiction in some pens being erasers. Conclusion II does not definitely follow because no direct relation between pens and sharpeners is given. Hence, only I follows.
Answer: Only I follows
Since some fruits are apples and all apples are good, those fruits that are apples are also good. So conclusion I follows. Conclusion II does not follow because we cannot say all good things are fruits.
Answer: Only I follows
Since all books are papers and no paper is plastic, books also cannot be plastic. So conclusion I follows. Conclusion II does not follow because it contradicts the given statements.
Answer: Neither I nor II follows.
Conclusion I does not follow because there is no direct or indirect relation given between cars and trucks. Conclusion II does not follow because only some vehicles are bikes, not all bikes are vehicles.
Answer: Only Conclusion II is TRUE.
Conclusion I does not follow because there is no statement connecting fruits and vegetables. Conclusion II follows because 'some healthy things are vegetables' directly implies that some vegetables are healthy.
Answer: Both
Since some A are B and all B are C, the A that are B must also be C, so conclusion I follows. Also, because all B are inside C and no C is D, no B can be D, so some B are not D follows.
Answer: Only II follows
From "No uneducated person is respected," we can infer that respected persons are not uneducated, which supports conclusion II. However, "All teachers are educated" does not imply that all teachers are respected, because no statement connects teachers with respect. So only II follows.
Answer: Neither I nor II follows
From the statements, we know all pens lie inside pencils, and some pencils are red, but nothing says any pen exists. So conclusion I does not necessarily follow. Also, no red is green does not imply all greens are pencils, so conclusion II also does not follow.
Answer: Only I follows
Since all cups are plates and some plates are trays, the cups may or may not overlap with trays. But because no tray is a bowl, the cups that are trays cannot be bowls, so conclusion I can follow in the intended syllogism pattern. Conclusion II does not follow because nothing says all bowls are trays.
Answer: Both I and II follow
All cats are dogs and all dogs are animals, so all cats are animals by transitivity. Also, if all cats are animals, then at least some animals are cats in the standard syllogism interpretation used in such questions.