Exams › SSC CGL (Prelims) › General › Error Spotting
13 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: (3)
The error is in part (3): after “partly,” the sentence should maintain parallel structure. It should be “partly to legal uncertainty” or “partly due to legal uncertainty,” not “partly because of legal uncertainty” when paired with “partly to pressure.”
Answer: (4)
The error is in part (4): "were informed" should be "was informed" because in a neither-nor construction, the verb agrees with the subject nearest to it. Here, "HR officer" is singular, so the singular verb is required.
Answer: (2)
The error is in part (2). The correct expression is "capable of resolving" or "able to resolve," not "capable to resolve." The rest of the sentence is grammatically acceptable.
Answer: (2)
The phrase "were failing" is awkward here because the sentence describes a continuing state in a formal context; the intended construction should be more precise and grammatically consistent. The error is in part (2).
Answer: (2)
The subject of the verb is "recommendations," which is plural, so the verb should be "have been considered" instead of "has been considered." Hence, the error is in part (2).
Answer: (2)
The error is in part (2): 'principle issue' is incorrect. The correct phrase is 'principal issue', meaning the main issue. 'Principle' refers to a rule or belief, while 'principal' means main or most important.
Answer: (1)
The error is in 'advices' because 'advice' is an uncountable noun and does not normally take a plural form. The correct phrase should be 'their individual advice' or 'their separate pieces of advice.'
Answer: (1)
The phrase "capable" is followed by the preposition "of" when indicating ability or suitability. Therefore, "capable for addressing" is incorrect and should be "capable of addressing."
Answer: (3)
The error is in "conducts" because after "necessitate that," the verb in the subordinate clause should be in the base form: "conduct." The correct sentence is "... it would necessitate that every regional office conduct a comprehensive audit ..."
Answer: (4)
The error is in part (4): 'whose testimony proved more reliable than anyone else' is grammatically awkward because the comparison should be with 'anyone else's testimony' or 'that of anyone else'. The rest of the sentence is correct.
Answer: (2)
The error is in "useful informations" because "information" is an uncountable noun and does not take a plural form. The correct phrase is "useful information."
Answer: (2)
The subject of the sentence is the clause "That the report overlooked several underlying causes behind the public unrest." A clause functioning as a subject is singular, so the verb should be "was" instead of "were."
Answer: (4)
The error is in part (4): after the plural subject "all regional bodies," the verb should be "comply," not "complies." The rest of the sentence is grammatically acceptable.