Exams › SSC CGL (Prelims) › General › English Grammar
114 questions with worked solutions.
Answer: where he is staying
In an indirect question, the word order is statement-like: subject + verb. So “where he is staying” is correct, not “where is he staying.”
Answer: demanded that I swallow the medication
The verb “demand” is followed by a that-clause: “demanded that I swallow.” The original sentence is ungrammatical because “demanded me to” is not standard usage.
Answer: 2, 1, 3, 4
Sentence 2 introduces the topic broadly. Sentence 1 explains the natural influences, sentence 3 adds the main human influence, and sentence 4 gives the concluding effect on energy balance and temperature.
Answer: (4)
The error is in “avoiding of early disclosure.” After “for,” the gerund should not take “of” here; the correct phrase is “avoidance of early disclosure” or “avoiding early disclosure.”
Answer: to getting up
The phrase "be used to" means accustomed to, and it is followed by a noun or gerund. Therefore, "to getting up" is correct, not "to get up".
Answer: (3)
The structure "not only... but also" requires parallel grammatical forms. Here, "are not only designed... but also improving" is incorrect; it should be "but also improve" or "but also are improving" depending on meaning.
Answer: (3)
The subject is "The fact", which is singular. Therefore, the verb should be "highlights" instead of "highlight".
Answer: Sikha said she liked that pen as it was very useful.
In indirect speech, the present tense "like" changes to past tense "liked." The demonstrative "this" changes to "that," and the pronoun changes from "I" to "she."
Q9. Select the correct option: The researcher found the correlation to be ________ weak to shape policy.
Answer: too
The structure "too weak to shape policy" is grammatically correct and conveys that the correlation was not strong enough. The other options do not fit the standard construction.
Answer: 1, 3, 4, 2
Sentence 1 introduces the issue of misleading content. Sentence 3 explains its impact, sentence 4 gives the response, and sentence 2 explains what that response involves. This creates a logical progression from problem to solution.
Answer: The analyst will have submitted the report before the deadline.
The sentence is in the future perfect passive form: "will have been submitted." In active voice, the agent "the analyst" becomes the subject, and the tense remains future perfect.
Q12. Select the correct option: Each of the reports __________ been verified before submission.
Answer: has
The subject is "Each," which is singular, so it takes a singular verb. Therefore, "has" is correct.
Answer: She asked where I had been living for the past few months.
The direct question is converted into reported speech using the reporting verb "asked." Since the original tense is present perfect continuous, it shifts to past perfect continuous in indirect speech.
Answer: followed a proper routine
The expression 'it is high time' is followed by the past tense to indicate that something should happen now. Therefore, 'you followed a proper routine' is the correct structure, and among the options the closest correct replacement is 'followed a proper routine'.
Answer: would have started earlier
The sentence expresses an unreal past condition, so the result should be in the third conditional form. 'Had I been aware of the delay, I would have started earlier' is grammatically correct.
Answer: She told me to finish it immediately.
The sentence is an imperative, so in indirect speech it becomes 'told me to finish it immediately'. The reporting verb and time expression are adjusted appropriately.
Answer: which
The clause 'none of which were implemented' is grammatically correct because 'which' refers to the directives. 'Whom' is used for people, and 'that' is not used after a preposition here.
Answer: “Employees need to submit their reports by Monday,” the manager remarked.
The indirect speech reports a statement, so the direct speech should be a declarative sentence. Since the obligation is expressed generally, 'need to submit' is the best direct form among the options.
Answer: had
The correct structure is 'No sooner had + subject + past participle + than...'. Here, 'had' is required before the subject 'the report' in inverted form. So the sentence should read: 'No sooner had the report been released than the media erupted with criticism.'
Answer: (1)
The error is in part (1) because 'neither' should be followed by a parallel structure with 'nor'. The sentence should read 'to neither prosecute minor violations nor overlook repeated breaches' or 'neither prosecute minor violations nor overlook repeated breaches' without the extra 'to' before the second verb phrase.
Answer: The intern submits a report to the supervisor every Monday.
In the passive sentence, 'the intern' is the agent introduced by 'by'. To change it into active voice, make 'the intern' the subject and keep the present simple tense because the original sentence is in present simple passive.
Answer: with
The correct collocation is "comply with" when referring to rules, instructions, or guidelines. Other prepositions do not fit this standard usage.
Answer: of clearing the interview
The adjective "confident" is commonly followed by "of" when expressing assurance about an outcome. So, "confident of clearing the interview" is correct.
Answer: (3)
The error is in part (3): "who state" should be "who stated" to maintain tense consistency with the past narrative. The rest of the sentence is grammatically acceptable.
Answer: (2)
The error is in part (2): the correct structure is "does indicate not only administrative expediency but also..." or "not only indicates... but also..." depending on the intended emphasis. As written, "does not only indicate" is awkward and incorrect in standard usage.
Answer: adapt to these changing circumstances
The verb "adapt" is followed by the preposition "to" when referring to adjustment to a situation. Therefore, "adapt to these changing circumstances" is correct.
Answer: Rita said that she had submitted the assignment.
The reporting verb "said" is in the past, so the past perfect "had submitted" remains unchanged in indirect speech. The pronoun also changes from "I" to "she".
Q28. Identify the misspelt word.
Answer: Supercilous
"Supercilous" is misspelt; the correct spelling is "supercilious". The other three words are correctly spelled.
Answer: at odds with
The phrase "at odds with" means in disagreement or conflict with. It fits the sentence because her conclusion contrasts with the committee’s earlier findings.
Answer: "The sun rises in the east," the professor remarked.
The statement "the sun rises in the east" is a universal truth, so it remains in the present simple tense. Therefore, the correct direct speech is the same sentence with quotation marks.
Answer: give away
"Give away" means to reveal or disclose something, especially a secret. Here, it fits because the reporter refused to reveal the identities of her informants.
Answer: does not understand
The subject "She" is singular third person, so the auxiliary should be "does" rather than "do". In negative present simple, the main verb remains in base form, so "understand" is correct. Hence, "does not understand" is the proper replacement.
Answer: Was the revised environmental policy sanctioned by the committee?
The sentence is in the simple past tense: "Did ... sanction". In passive voice, the object "the revised environmental policy" becomes the subject, and the verb changes to "was sanctioned". Since it is a question in active voice, the passive form is a statement here.
Answer: whose
"Whose" is the correct relative pronoun to show possession. Here, the conclusions belong to the report, so "whose conclusions" is grammatically correct. The other options do not express possession.
Answer: Authorities thought the suspect had been staying in a remote lodge before they arrested him.
The passive structure "was thought to have been staying" can be rewritten in active voice by supplying a logical subject such as "authorities." The action of staying is in the past perfect continuous sense relative to the arrest, so the active form becomes "had been staying". This preserves the meaning most accurately.
Answer: junior to
The adjective "junior" is followed by "to" when comparing rank or status. Therefore, "Ravi is junior to his brother" is correct. The phrase "junior than" is ungrammatical.
Answer: (4)
The phrase "warnings issued by auditors" is plural, so the relative clause should use a plural verb. The error is in "has been ignored," which should be "have been ignored" to agree with "warnings." Therefore, part (4) contains the error.
Answer: Several experts have reviewed the final report.
In passive voice, 'The final report' is the subject, but in active voice the doer becomes the subject. Since the original tense is present perfect passive, the active form is 'Several experts have reviewed the final report.'
Answer: (2)
The error is in part (2): 'whether ... or if' is incorrect here. The sentence should use parallel structure, such as 'whether to approve the merger or whether the announcement was merely a diversion.'
Q40. Convert the following direct speech into indirect speech: He said, “My friends will leave tonight.”
Answer: He said that his friends would leave that night.
In indirect speech, 'will' changes to 'would' when the reporting verb is in the past tense. The time expression 'tonight' changes to 'that night', so the correct sentence is 'He said that his friends would leave that night.'
Answer: (2)
The error is in part (2): the subject of the clause is singular, so the verb should be "has led" instead of "have led." The rest of the sentence is grammatically acceptable in context.
Answer: is
The sentence states a present condition and its immediate effect, so the simple present tense is needed. "Is" correctly fits the singular subject "firewall."
Answer: for
The correct idiomatic phrase is "for the sake of profit." The other prepositions do not form the standard expression.
Answer: Special awards can be granted to outstanding researchers by the committee.
In passive voice, the object "special awards" becomes the subject. Since the active sentence uses "can grant," the passive form is "can be granted."
Answer: lest he slip
"Lest" is used to express a negative purpose and is commonly followed by a base verb form. "Lest he slip" is the most appropriate replacement.
Answer: quickly
"Answered" is a verb, so it should be modified by an adverb. The correct adverb form is "quickly," not the adjective "quick."
Answer: were present
In a neither-nor construction, the verb agrees with the subject closest to it. Since "students" is plural, the correct verb is "were". The sentence should read: "Neither the teacher nor the students were present in the hall."
Answer: The database will be being updated during the session.
The active sentence is in future continuous tense: "will be updating." In passive voice, future continuous becomes "will be being + past participle." Therefore, the correct passive form is "The database will be being updated during the session."
Answer: explained to me
The verb "explain" takes the preposition "to" before the person being addressed. So, the correct phrase is "explained to me." The other options are grammatically incorrect in standard English.
Answer: has submitted the form
"Each" is a singular subject, so it takes a singular verb. Therefore, "has submitted" is correct, not "have submitted."