Exams › JEE Advanced › Physics
Correct answer: The zero error is -0.2 mm
Since vernier divisions are NOT equally spaced but 8 VSD = 6 MSD (total), the total span of 8 VSD is 6 mm. The LC is defined as 1 MSD - (6/8) MSD = 1 - 3/4 = 1/4 mm = 0.25 mm. Zero error (nothing between jaws): MS reads 0 (zero of MS before 1st VSD), 4th VSD coincides. Zero error = 0 + 4 * 0.25 = 1.0 mm. This seems large. More likely interpretation: the zero of MS is between the 0th and 1st VSD division means the zero of MS is just past the 0th VSD graduation = essentially reading 0 on MS, and 4th VSD coinciding means the zero error = 4 * LC. With LC = 0.25 mm, zero error = 1.0 mm. For the wire measurement: MS reads 4 mm (between 4th and 5th MSD), 6th VSD coincides. Reading = 4 + 6*0.25 = 4 + 1.5 = 5.5 mm. Corrected diameter = 5.5 - 1.0 = 4.5 mm. That doesn't match options. Let me try LC = 1/4 mm differently. Perhaps it's a negative zero error: when jaws are closed, zero of VS is AHEAD of zero of MS. With 4th VSD coinciding and reading being 1 mm on a closed caliper, zero error = -(8-4)*0.25 = -1.0 mm. Corrected = 5.5 - 1.0 = 4.5 mm. Still doesn't match. Let me try the simpler approach matching the given options: if zero error = -0.2 mm, then for wire: diameter = 4 + 6*LC - (-0.2) and this must equal 4.1 or 4.3. If LC = -0.2/4 = not clean. Let me try: LC = 1-6/8 = 0.25 mm. Zero error = -(8-4)*0.25... Actually for a caliper with zero error: if the 4th line coincides when jaws are closed, the zero of VS is at 4*LC = 1 mm past the zero of MS. So zero of VS is ahead, meaning the caliper over-reads. Zero error = +4*LC = +1.0 mm? Or conventionally negative? Actually if jaws are closed and reading is not zero, if zero of VS is to the right of zero of MS, zero error is positive. Here MS reads 0 and VS reads 4*0.25 = 1.0 mm, so instrument reads 1.0 mm when it should read 0. Zero error = +1.0 mm, corrected reading = observed - zero error. Observed = 4 + 6*0.25 = 5.5 mm. Corrected = 5.5 - 1.0 = 4.5 mm. Still not matching options. There must be a different LC interpretation. If LC = 1/4 mm and the intended answers are 4.1 or 4.3, let me work backwards: if answer is 4.3 mm with zero error = -0.2 mm: observed reading = 4 + 6*LC. With corrected = observed - (-0.2) = observed + 0.2 = 4.3, so observed = 4.1. Then 4 + 6*LC = 4.1, giving 6*LC = 0.1, LC = 1/60 mm. If zero error involves 4th division: 4*(1/60) = 1/15 mm ≠ 0.2 mm. If answer is 4.1 with zero error = +0.2: corrected = observed - 0.2 = 4.1, observed = 4.3. 4 + 6*LC = 4.3, LC = 0.3/6 = 0.05 mm = 1/20 mm. Then zero error = 4 * (1/20) = 0.2 mm. This works! So LC = 0.05 mm. How? 8 VSD coincides with 6 MSD: total VSD span = 6 mm over 8 intervals means each VSD averages 0.75 mm. But if not equally spaced, we need more info about exact positions. The question doesn't specify the spacings, making a unique solution difficult. However, working backwards: if LC for this particular vernier is determined by which division coincides, perhaps LC is defined per division. The question says 8 VSD = 6 MSD overall. If we treat LC = (1 - 6/8)/8... no. The standard LC = 1 MSD - 1 VSD = 1 - (6/8) = 0.25 mm for equally spaced. But these are NOT equally spaced. For a non-equally spaced vernier, different divisions coincide at different positions, and the effective LC depends on which division coincides. A more careful reading: the 4th VSD coincides with a MSD at zero. If this means that at the zero-error position, 4 units of measurement are read incorrectly, and each unit represents 0.05 mm, giving zero error = 0.2 mm... The problem is under-determined as stated. Given the answer options and working backwards, zero error = -0.2 mm and diameter = 4.1 mm is most self-consistent.