Exams › IBPS PO › Reasoning
In an attempt to check its increasing pollution, Litter City has introduced a levy of Rs. 100 on every private car entering the city. The administration argues that the imposition of this levy, in addition to the existing toll at the entrance of the city, will switch people from using their cars to using public transport. Which of the following, if true, provides the best evidence that the city administration’s argument is flawed?
- The city administration is already facing the ire of taxi drivers whose demand for a rate hike was turned down by the administration.
- A recent survey has shown that people living in Litter City have fewer cars than those in the neighboring clean city.
- Hardly 10% of the regular bus passengers own their own cars.
- The recent hike in the toll for cars already makes it more expensive for people to take a private car into the city than travel by public transport.
Correct answer: The recent hike in the toll for cars already makes it more expensive for people to take a private car into the city than travel by public transport.
Solution
The administration’s argument assumes that the new levy will be the factor that pushes people toward public transport. If car travel is already more expensive than public transport because of the existing toll, then the new levy does not strengthen that incentive in any meaningful way. This weakens the argument most directly.
Related IBPS PO Reasoning questions
- Twenty percent of all energy consumed in the country is consumed by home appliances. If appliances that are twice as energy-efficient as those currently available are manufactured, this figure will eventually be reduced to about ten percent. The argument above requires which of the following assumptions?
- The difficulty with the proposed high-speed train line is that a used plane can be bought for one-third the price of the train line, and the plane, which is just as fast, can fly anywhere. The train would be a fixed linear system, and we live in a world that is spreading out in all directions and in which consumers choose free-wheel systems (cars, buses, aircraft), which do not have fixed routes. Thus, a sufficient market for the train will not exist. Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the argument presented above?
- The US President has downsized his country’s nuclear arsenal, helped negotiate a deal to halt Iran’s nuclear-weapons programme, and led a global initiative to secure radioactive materials. But his legacy on nuclear issues remains uncertain, as progress in securing nuclear materials has been slow. Which of the following is an assumption of the speaker?
- Statements: Should all indirect taxes in India be combined into a single tax on all commodities? Arguments: I. Yes. This will considerably simplify the tax collection mechanism, and the cost of collecting tax will also reduce. II. Yes. Manufacturers and traders will be benefited by this, which in turn will boost tax collection. III. No. No other country has adopted such a system.
- Statements: Should trade unions be banned completely? Arguments: I. Yes. Workers can concentrate on production. II. No. This is the only way through which employees can put their demands before the management. III. Yes. Employees get their illegal demands fulfilled through these unions. IV. No. Trade unions are not banned in other economically advanced countries.
- Statement: Should India make efforts to harness solar energy to fulfil its energy requirements? Arguments: I. Yes, most of the energy sources used at present are exhaustible. II. No, harnessing solar energy requires a lot of capital, which India lacks.
⚔️ Practice IBPS PO Reasoning free + battle 1v1 →